The “home” is a contract in which the creditor is authorized by the creditor to receive rents or income from the house and country of debt and is paid for the benefit or interest of the debt. In general, in a residence, the total rent in a door or room is to be paid for the tube. If the debt is still not paid, he cannot recover the right to rent or income from his property. Such a contract is signed by law under section 2132 of the New Civil Code, it is called “Antichressis”. Discovered about the concept of offensive residence recently and it got my attention… My understanding is that you lend the homeowner a certain amount, says 300km, and you can use tge house. After a contractual time, says 2 years, leave the house and the owner makes your 300km. Someone asks E-Lawyers Online if “residence” is legal and how much profit to pay here. An online reader of E-Lawyers said: In accordance with Article 2134 of the new Civil Code, in order to actually have an anti-Chresis contract, it should be written where the amount of capital or the amount of money borrowed and profit calculated here is written and signed by both parties, creditors If not written, the hosting contract is not performing. If you want to consult “residence” problems with debts or the correct provision of profit on loans, register and register my website and www.e-lawyersonline.com. Not all scams are agorable, but ppls do.
LMAO I know a lot about this trend in Olongapo, Zambales. It`s like saying Snare (assumed balance) is a scam. You won`t be betrayed if you know how it works. He also has a contract. The usual problem here is that the death of a sudden pace is that money is not available. Dear PAO, my mother has a “living” contract with Mando with our untitled house and land in Taguig City (Metro Manila). The contract stipulates that my mother P300,000 borrowed from Mando and the latter to take the theme of the house and lot for two years or something like in 2014. It also provides that if my mother is not able to pay the million P300.00 after two years, Mando will own the property. We did not pay the P300,000.00 in 2014 to a mother who was suffering from a heart disease that caused her death. “We had 4 doors from the apartment atty and we entered a “residence”, where we have P200,000 and rent to the 2-door apartment that they were charged with renting as a pipeline fee. We didn`t want to pay them a year, but for a year, we wanted to pay them to the director, but we wouldn`t sign anything.
Is that what you legally want? It`s risky at IMO, the mosaic residence “systems” work on trust, and that`s how it is in our region. I don`t think I`ve seen one with a real contract, or if I`m offered one, they can`t provide a copy of the unit/house-sale-sale copy as collateral, 🤷🏽 ♀️ I suggest consulting a lawyer, if there are facts, it`s hard to run away. “I`M IN ASK WHEN RESIDENCY IS LEGAL? WOULD YOU MAKE A PROFIT FOR US WITHOUT YOU? Mando having refused to receive the amount of P300,000.00 and interest, your appeal is the transfer of the sum to the judicial authority under Article 1258 of the new civil code of the Philippines.